JMock expectations oneOf VS one difference Is any difference in using one() or oneOf() in JMock? In cheat sheet mentioned before there is also example. Appendix A. jMock2 Cheat Sheet Introduction We use jMock2 as our mock object We’re using JUnit (we assume you’re familiar with it); jMock also. jMock 1 Documentation Stubs, Expectations and the Dispatch of Mocked Methods in jMock 1 3; Mocking Classes with jMock 1 and CGLIB 4 Cheat Sheet .
|Published (Last):||4 April 2016|
|PDF File Size:||4.36 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.80 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The equalTo constraint uses the equals method of the expected value to compare the expected and actual values for equality. Constrains the last expectation to occur only when the state machine is in the named state.
jMock – jMock 1 Documentation
Sign up using Email and Password. The anyOf matcher specifies that the actual argument must meet at least one of the matchers given as arguments. The following code specifies that the method “doSomething” must be called chfat a string that either contains the text “hello” or the text “howdy”. Matchers Most of the time expectations specify literal parameter values that are compared for equality against the actual parameters of invoked methods.
The following code specifies that the method “doSomething” will be called with one argument of value 1 plus or minus 0. JUnit 3 JUnit 4 Other.
mjock The examples above assume that the mock object is stored in an instance variable. More matchers are defined as static methods in the org.
Expect a Sequence of Invocations
We first set up the context in which our test will execute. Which probably says that oneOf means that I expect that could be more invocations of method add and in this case there are two invocations one of them is with parameters 1 and 1, jomck second with parameters 2 and 2. We then register the Subscriber with the Publisher. The most commonly used matcher is equalwhich specifies that the received argument must be equal to a given value. A test can create more than chewt sequence and an expectation can be part of more than once sequence at a time.
The following code specifies that method “doSomething” must be called with an argument that is a string containing the aheet “hello”. If a mock object is stored in a local variable, the variable must be declared as final so that it can be referred to from within expectation blocks see below.
LoganMzz 1, 2 12 Conditions are represented as states of state machines.
In cheat sheet mentioned before there is also example: The code below, for example, specifies that the method “doSomething” must be called with one argument of value 1. A test can contain multiple expectation blocks.
Post as a guest Name. In chezt I can see using one and in other there is oneOf. Sometimes, however, you will need to define looser constraints over parameter values to clearly express the intent of the test or to ignore parameters or parts of parameters that are not relevant to the behaviour being tested. You don’t have to explicitly verify the mock cheay in your tests.
Matchers are created by factory methods, such as lessThanequal and stringContaining in the hseet above, to ensure that the expectation is easy to read.
The JUnit 3 and JUnit 4 integration layers automatically assert that all expectations have been satisfied. The following code specifies that method “doSomething” will be called with one argument that refers to the same object as expected. Most of the time expectations specify literal parameter values that are shest for equality against the actual parameters of invoked methods. The argument matches all of the Matchers m 1 to m n. You can give an expectation as many inSequencewhenwill and then clauses as you wish.
The MockObjectTestCase does this automatically. First we must import the jMock classes, define our test fixture class and create a “Mockery” that represents the context in which the Publisher exists. States are used to constrain invocations to occur ccheat when a condition is true. The argument is any value.